logo
  • Entries
  • Comments
  • Popular
Recent Posts
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • April 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
Recent Comments
  • Pandanarol Who here thinks that they have most of the answers? I won�t ...
  • sliding door window treatments Hey, I found web site is very interesting. I liked your blog...
  • sheer curtains Hey, I appreciate the articles and outstanding design you go...
  • online surveys for money It is a nice article.This site has lots of advantage.I found...
  • Cheap UK Web Design Awesome post but seriously the sheer amount of advertisement...
Popular Articles
  • The weight of IRS rulings and other documents, and what constitutes “substantial authority” - BY RIA CHECKPOINT (207)
  • BVI seeks input on proposed BVIBC amendments (157)
  • TAX: Updated multilateral tax convention now open to all countries (114)
  • Tax competition not tax evasion is the real agenda for OFC critics (105)
  • Intellectual Property in not "capital" as contemplated in Excon Regulations in South Africa (67)
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Contact Me
Jan 21

Vodafone wins in India – the essence of the anti-avoidance court analysis

Posted by Prof Daniel N. Erasmus on Jan 21, 2012 in General Blogs | 4 comments
FULL JUDGMENT – http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/outtoday/sc2652910.pdf Our Analysis 58. Before coming to Indo-Mauritius DTAA, we need to clear 31 the doubts raised on behalf of the Revenue regarding the correctness of Azadi Bachao (supra) for the simple reason that certain tests laid down in the judgments of the English Courts subsequent to The Commissioners of Inland Revenue v. His Grace the Duke of Westminster 1935 All E.R. 259 and W.T. Ramsay Ltd. v. Inland Revenue Commissioners (1981) 1 All E.R. 865 help us to understand the scope of Indo- Mauritius DTAA. It needs to be...
Jan 16

US Tax – Several ways to receive W-2 information from the IRS and SSA

Posted by Prof Daniel N. Erasmus on Jan 16, 2012 in General Blogs | 10 comments
WE received a disturbing question the other day about a taxpayer using the wrong SS number, getting his own SS number, and now wanting to file correctly. It would mean going back and changing all his tax filing and SS filings in the past. Several ways to receive W-2 information from the IRS and SSA: There are several ways to receive information about a previously-filed W-2 form from the IRS or the Social Security Administration (SSA). IRS. A taxpayer may file Form 4506-T, Request for Transcript of Tax Return, to ask the IRS for a transcript of the information on Form W-2 or Form 1099....
Jan 13

US Int’l Tax – Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program Reopens

Posted by Prof Daniel N. Erasmus on Jan 13, 2012 in General Blogs | 6 comments
Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program Reopens The Internal Revenue Service reopened the offshore voluntary disclosure program to help people hiding offshore accounts get current with their taxes. The IRS also announced the collection of more than $4.4 billion so far from the two previous international disclosure programs. IRS Offshore Programs Produce $4.4 Billion To Date for Nation’s Taxpayers; Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program Reopens IR-2012-5, Jan. 9, 2012 WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service today reopened the offshore voluntary disclosure program to help people...
Jan 13

US Tax – Eight Facts to Help Determine Your Correct Filing Status

Posted by Prof Daniel N. Erasmus on Jan 13, 2012 in General Blogs | 8 comments
Eight Facts to Help Determine Your Correct Filing Status Determining your filing status is one of the first steps to filing your federal income tax return. There are five filing statuses: Single, Married Filing Jointly, Married Filing Separately, Head of Household and Qualifying Widow(er) with Dependent Child. Your filing status is used to determine your filing requirements, standard deduction, eligibility for certain credits and deductions, and your correct tax. Some people may qualify for more than one filing status. Here are eight facts about filing status that the IRS wants you to...
Jan 11

US Tax – Do I Need to File a Tax Return This Year?

Posted by Prof Daniel N. Erasmus on Jan 11, 2012 in General Blogs | 30 comments
Issue Number: IRS TAX TIP 2012-02 Inside This Issue Do I Need to File a Tax Return This Year? You are required to file a federal income tax return if your income is above a certain level, which varies depending on your filing status, age and the type of income you receive. However, the Internal Revenue Service reminds taxpayers that some people should file even if they aren’t required to because they may get a refund if they had taxes withheld or they may qualify for refundable credits. To find out if you need to file, check the Individuals section of the IRS website at...
Jan 11

US Tax – Six Important Facts about Dependents and Exemptions

Posted by Prof Daniel N. Erasmus on Jan 11, 2012 in General Blogs | 26 comments
Issue Number: IRS TAX TIP 2012-07 Inside This Issue Six Important Facts about Dependents and Exemptions Even though each individual tax return is different, some tax rules affect every person who may have to file a federal income tax return. These rules include dependents and exemptions. The IRS has six important facts about dependents and exemptions that will help you file your 2011 tax return. 1. Exemptions reduce your taxable income. There are two types of exemptions: personal exemptions and exemptions for dependents. For each exemption you can deduct $3,700 on your 2011 tax...
Dec 23

Happy Holidays and a Wonderful Festive Season to you all – and a great 2012

Posted by Prof Daniel N. Erasmus on Dec 23, 2011 in General Blogs | 1 comment
The blogging will re-commence in 2012
Dec 22

US Tax Case – IRS agrees—professional gambler’s business expenses not subject to loss limitation

Posted by Prof Daniel N. Erasmus on Dec 22, 2011 in General Blogs | 12 comments
IRS agrees—professional gambler’s business expenses not subject to loss limitation AOD 2011-06,12/21/2011 IRS has issued an action on decision (AOD) announcing its acquiescence with the Tax Court’s decision in Mayo, (2011) 136 TC, that the business expenses of a taxpayer engaged in the trade or business of gambling are not subject to Code Sec. 165(d). While, as the Tax Court also held in Mayo, Code Sec. 165(d) limits the deduction for gambling losses of a taxpayer engaged in the trade or business of gambling to the taxpayer’s gains from wagering transactions, the...
« Older Entries

Associations/ Memberships

Search my blog

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by Wordpress